Naked Lunch Book
Review (with a couple of brief allusions to The Wasteland)
Naked Lunch, the famed work of the controversial
American post-modernist writer William S Burroughs, was interesting to read to
say the least and is perhaps the most testing novel I have ever read (at frequent
points I considered burning the work and tearing it apart I was so appalled
initially at its obscene and fragmented nature). Halfway through though, in order to
obtain my sanity, I decided to give up attempting to read it for pleasure and
turned on the ‘critic’s mindset’ as it were, and it is predominantly with this mindset that I
construct this review. The novel follows the often-absent author Bill Lee's trek through various continents and wastelands, the presence of drugs and addiction
being rather overwhelming. The places described furthermore make Eliot’s The Wasteland seem like a description of
some heavenly paradise they were so destitute, barren, diseased and despair-ridden, the places and the events that unfold being based on Burroughs' years in areas such as Tangiers, though they are exaggerated to a surreal level. As I
have said, from the point of view of an individual reading for pleasure there
were few redeeming features in the work however, despite this dislike,
from a critical perspective I can SOMEWHAT appreciate its worth.
One of
the main themes of the novel itself is its damning condemnation of the
lifestyle of ‘old, dirty and evil’ America
and her quintessential characteristics. Her position on matters of moral
contention is patronised through the ugly image of individuals ‘performing cut-rate abortions in subway
toilets’ whilst the typical personality types of the alpha-male
husband and the beauty queen are decimated in the following two images: ‘the Salvation Army of sincere, homosexual
football coaches [singing]’ and the ‘[decapitation
of] the American Girls’. The strong position of religion in American
culture is equally mocked through the line ‘Emmanuel
prophesises a Second Coming’ (which given the context of the novel and its
salacious nature has little to do with religion). Burroughs' outlines in his
afterword that one of the aims in the novel was ‘to reveal capital punishment {which even now is legal in 32 states of the country} as
the obscene, barbaric and disgusting anachronism that it is’ and this is
accomplished through a series of pornographic and primitive scenes in which
individuals are hung for sexual enjoyment, severely degrading the principles of
the practice. The whole ideal is thus mocked decisively along with those who
watch on and take no political stance against the scandalous injustice as seen
in the lookers-on who ‘shush each other,
nudge and giggle’ amidst the spectacle. Burroughs also ridicules American
capitalism and vanity as seen in the ludicrous portrayal of an individual who ‘since he has nothing to do…saves all his
pay to buy fine clothes and changes three times a day in front of an enormous
magnifying mirror’. Equally the description of ‘One
Night Stands’, a means through which an individual can prop up their
appearance for one more night of desirability before dying instantly afterwards has stark resemblances of the pub talk of The Wasteland and the destruction the birth prevention pills do to
an individual’s body. Through attempting to stop normal biological processes we
are destroying ourselves. American propriety is equally shamed through the line
‘ten prominent citizens – American, of
course – subsequently died of shame’, this especially had resonance in a work
that aims to open doors and expose hypocrisy, indeed its name originating for
the wish to look into that ‘frozen
moment when everyone sees what is on the end of every fork’ and all facades
fall apart. Indeed Burroughs’ mission is perhaps best exemplified through the
image of ‘flesh [turning] to viscid,
transparent jelly that drifts away in the green mist, unveiling a monster black
centipede’, the images of corrupt politicians, doctors, sheriffs and the
like expose the black immorality that lies behind their clean exterior. To
conclude, perhaps the best image to showcase Burroughs’ hatred towards his
country is that of the ‘decayed,
corseted tenor bursting out of a Daniel Boone costume –…singing “The
Star-Spangled Banner”’, America, in his opinion, is little more than a
rubbish heap. This utter thrashing of the country’s ideals and morals does
indeed add a rather bitter tone that underlies most of the work, however
several key, valid points are made by Burroughs, supporting the claim of two of
his fans over the ‘insight and prophecy’
of the work. One also gets a sense of an individual who clearly does not
fit into his society (Burroughs being homosexual and a renowned drug addict)
and that Naked Lunch in part acts as
a means for him to unleash his frustrations over this fact. The sense of condemning this lifestyle often viewed as the norm also suggests another message from Burroughs, that of needing to question everything, not taking for granted patriotism, religion, expectations and traditional morality and being sucked into the void of convention, but actively analyzing the way the world is and challenging convention if need be. Burroughs, according to his biographer Barry Miles, indeed believed that the only way to challenge convention was through immorality, perhaps explaining the intensity of immoral images and events in the novel.
The
principle theme of the novel however has to be addiction, something that all
the varied individuals described in the work have in common. It relegates them to
complete desperation and shame, one individual noting how he’d do ‘anything’
to have another shot of junk (note the italics), the drugs taking an almost
maternal role through their comforting influence as seen in ‘the kicking addict nursing his baby flesh’.
The junk has a complete hold over the addict’s life and is the only thing that
they live for, as seen in the effective imagery of ‘days glide by strung on a syringe with a long thread of blood’ and
all this is done despite the material, economic, social and mental destruction
that addiction brings about. Perhaps the most effective phrasing in the work to
reflect this utter dependence comes in the line ‘home is the heroin’, the changed order of words (it not being the
more grammatically sound and expected ‘heroin is the home’) reflects how the drug has
taken the place of any physical source of refuge or comfort. Indeed Burroughs’
describes addiction to junk as being a ‘metabolic
addiction’, something that is almost unwilling, but a biological need for
survival. For me, one of the critical strengths of the work is how a complete
picture of addiction is painted, despite the fragmented and disconnected
structure that elsewhere predominates.
To be
honest I was personally repulsed by the vulgar, vomit-inducing, salacious, contaminated
and uncomfortable images that Naked Lunch
brought to the forefront and I have to admit that this is the first book
when I have ever quite frankly understood the case of the courts that
prominently opposed it at its early inception. Indeed, despite the critics Barry Miles and James Grauerholz noting the hilarious tone of the work, personally I think ‘horrifying’ would be
a more fitting description. Certainly regardless of its critical value, in terms of
reading for pleasure there was no such thing with Naked Lunch for me personally. Furthermore, especially with the capital
punishment argument Burroughs ingrained in the work, the pornographic segment
aimed to display it, after inducing shock and repulsion then became rather dull
and repetitive as successive sexualised hangings occurred, the argument rather
losing its power and effect through the presentation. In comparison to works such as Nabokov's Lolita, which addresses similar issues of discomfort and moral backwardness, the over-the-top and blatant approach seemed rather superficial and was far less effective. However,
having read the more human after-notes I have since somewhat retracted from my
staunchly opposed stance to the work, which at one point had led be to add
‘this is not literature’ to my annotations, and now I can partially understand
its position on the literary canon. Moving on from the content to the style,
the fragmented tone certainly took adjusting too. Despite at first maintaining
a slight sense of coherence, the novel, towards the end became increasingly
difficult to decipher before fading into nothingness (this incoherence is somewhat explained by the nature of the book's composition, it originated as letters written by Burroughs to his former lover Ginsberg who then realised their literary merit and so, with writer Jack Kerouac, came to Burroughs to help him compile and edit the mass of content)…it certainly is not the
ideal book for those looking for an easy, casual read.... In Burroughs own words, ‘[the sections of the novel] atrophy and
amputate spontaneous like the little two amputates in a West African disease
confined to the Negro race’ and indeed it is true that the traditional idea
of a fixed text is completely rebelled against in Naked Lunch and I did find there to be certain literary strengths through such an approach. The disconnected style added further to the confusion and dismay of the wasteland
described and also mirrored the presumed sense of being under the influence of
drugs (the world that surrounds the addict disappearing into a disordered void of
intangible activity). There was also a sense, in many areas, of the form being
reminiscent of note-taking along with the suggestion of a voyeuristic narrator, perhaps explaining the inconsistency.
What interested me most about the writing style has to be however Burroughs’ insane
obsession with using ellipses, to a level such that Dickinson’s
addiction to the dash was almost superseded. Indeed, fellow writer and friend of Burroughs, Ginsberg once alluded to Burroughs in one of his poems as an individual ‘obsessed with a sudden flash of the
alchemy of the use of the ellipsis’. In terms of what it added to the work, undoubtedly
the frequent ellipses accentuated the atmosphere of confusion evoked by the
fragmented style itself. They also had a mocking, dare I say humorous purpose,
of ridiculing the boring ennui of the American lifestyle whilst also allowing the
disjointed sections to somewhat sync together, acting as a welcome bridge. Thus, despite my personal objections as a reader, as a critic there is much to be said for Burroughs' style and imagery.
Therefore
to conclude, despite on a personal level finding Naked Lunch to be a nightmare read, on a critical level much has to
be said about the effects of Burroughs’ unique approach to the text along with
his success in portraying a sense of despair, horror and absorption that comes
with addiction. This is however certainly not a read for the lighthearted or
those with weak stomachs....
No comments:
Post a Comment